The new 2024 Clean Energy Close Up report by Stand.earth reveals a concerning lack of progress from major fashion brands in reducing their reliance on fossil fuels and decarbonizing their supply chains. Key findings include:
Key Findings:
Insufficient Decarbonization: Most brands scored less than 25 out of 100 points, indicating a lack of tangible action towards reducing emissions and transitioning to renewable energy.
Slow Progress: Only Levi's, Puma, and H&M are on track to meet the 55% emission reduction target by 2030.
Shein's Emissions Surge: Fast-fashion giant Shein significantly increased its emissions, now surpassing the annual pollution of Paraguay.
Greenwashing Concerns: Some brands, like Lululemon, are accused of misleading consumers about their environmental impact.
Positive Developments:
Puma's Renewable Growth: Puma reported a significant increase in clean energy use, although more transparency is needed regarding their sources.
H&M's Supplier Grants: H&M is the only brand offering grants to suppliers for decarbonization initiatives, but they need to disclose their progress more fully.
Challenges and Recommendations:
Supplier Accountability: Brands need to take greater responsibility for emissions in their supply chains and invest in renewable energy solutions for manufacturers.
Transparency: Greater transparency is needed regarding supplier relationships and the location of manufacturing facilities.
Financial Support: Brands should provide financial assistance to suppliers for transitioning to renewable energy.
Overall:
The report highlights the urgent need for the fashion industry to accelerate its efforts in phasing out fossil fuels and transitioning to renewable energy. While some progress has been made, the majority of brands are falling short of their climate goals and risk undermining global efforts to combat climate change.
Comments