Food: UPF ‘risk scale’ launched by Zoe to tackle ‘scaremongering’
- InsightTrendsWorld
- Mar 31
- 9 min read
Why is the topic trending?
Debate on Ultra-Processed Foods (UPFs): There is significant ongoing discussion and concern among consumers and health experts regarding the health impacts of ultra-processed foods.
Challenging Existing Classification: Zoe's introduction of a new UPF 'risk scale' directly challenges the widely used NOVA classification system, creating a point of discussion and potential controversy.
Industry Response and Controversy: The strong reactions from the UK food industry, condemning Zoe's scale and defending their use of additives, further contribute to the trending nature of this topic.
Consumer Empowerment: Zoe positions its scale as a tool to help consumers make more informed choices, which is a topic of high interest in the health and food space.
Overview:
The health app Zoe has launched its own Ultra-Processed Food (UPF) 'risk scale' to address what it perceives as consumer "scaremongering" surrounding these foods. This new scale categorizes processed foods into four risk levels (no risk, low risk, moderate risk, and high risk), differing from the existing NOVA classification system and a similar scale under research by the Novo Nordisk Foundation. Zoe's scale considers energy intake and the combination of 'natural' and 'manmade' ingredients, including "hyperpalatability" factors. While Zoe argues this scale will empower consumers to make informed choices and prevent the demonization of all processed foods, the UK food industry has strongly condemned the new system, stating it will confuse consumers and contradicts government healthy eating advice.
Detailed Findings:
Zoe's Food Risk Scale: The scale divides UPFs into four categories: no risk, low risk, moderate risk, and high risk.
Classification Examples: Unsalted butter and dark chocolate are classified as ‘no risk’, while margarines, sliced white bread, milk chocolate, and chicken nuggets are deemed ‘high risk’.
Rationale for New Scale: Zoe aims to prevent the "scaremongering" about all processed foods and empower consumers to make informed choices within the category.
Similarities to Other Research: Zoe’s system, like research by Professor Susanne Bügel for Novo Nordisk, classifies foods based on energy intake and the combination of ‘natural’ and ‘manmade’, “hyperpalatability” ingredients.
Reception in the House of Lords: The report introducing the scale was reportedly welcomed in a House of Lords debate as a potential path forward for understanding food risks.
Future App Integration: Zoe plans to integrate the scale into its app, allowing users to scan food products and receive a risk assessment.
Food Industry Criticism: The UK Food & Drink Federation (FDF) condemned Zoe's scale, arguing it contradicts government advice and would confuse consumers.
Industry Defense of Additives: The FDF maintains that all additives used by food manufacturers are approved by the Food Standards Agency and are safe to eat and drink, labeling Zoe's claims of high risk as irresponsible.
Critique of the Food Industry: It was suggested that the food industry has shown a lack of effort in addressing UPF concerns, prioritizing profit from ultra-processed foods and resisting change.
Industry Perspective on Dietary Guidance: The FDF believes dietary guidance should be based on robust scientific evidence assessed by expert independent committees, which they claim have found the evidence against UPFs weak.
Key Takeaway:
Zoe has launched a new UPF 'risk scale' to provide a more nuanced categorization of processed foods, aiming to empower consumers and counter what they see as excessive fear-mongering. However, this initiative has been met with strong opposition from the UK food industry, which argues the scale is confusing and contradicts established health advice.
Main Trend:
The Shifting Landscape of Ultra-Processed Food Categorization and Consumer Guidance
Description of the Trend (The Shifting Landscape of Ultra-Processed Food Categorization and Consumer Guidance):
This trend highlights the ongoing debate and evolving approaches to classifying and providing guidance on ultra-processed foods. The existing NOVA system, while widely used, is facing challenges and alternative frameworks, such as Zoe's Food Risk Scale and research by the Novo Nordisk Foundation, are emerging. These new approaches attempt to differentiate within the broad category of UPFs, recognizing that not all processed foods may carry the same level of health risk. This signals a move towards a more granular understanding of UPFs and a potential shift in how consumers are advised to navigate these foods in their diets.
What is Consumer Motivation?
Consumers are motivated by:
Seeking Clarity and Understanding: They are often confused by conflicting information about the health impacts of processed foods.
Desire for Informed Choices: They want tools and information that empower them to make healthier dietary decisions.
Reducing Anxiety Around Food: Zoe's scale aims to reduce "scaremongering," suggesting consumers may be feeling anxious about the prevalence of UPFs in their diet.
Finding Practical Guidance: They need actionable advice on which processed foods to choose or avoid.
What is Driving the Trend?
Growing Awareness of UPF Consumption: Increased public and scientific attention on the potential health risks associated with high consumption of UPFs is driving the need for better classification and guidance.
Limitations of Existing Systems: The NOVA system has been criticized for being too broad and not differentiating enough between different types of processed foods.
Scientific Research and Evolving Understanding: Ongoing research is refining our understanding of how different processing methods and ingredients affect health.
Technological Advancements: Health apps like Zoe can leverage technology to provide personalized and accessible food guidance.
What is Motivation Beyond the Trend?
Beyond the immediate drivers, motivations might include:
Improving Public Health: The ultimate goal of better UPF classification and guidance is to help people make healthier dietary choices and reduce the burden of diet-related diseases.
Restoring Trust in Food Information: Clearer, less sensationalized information can help build trust in dietary recommendations.
Description of Consumers Article is Referring To:
The article refers to consumers in the United Kingdom, where Zoe launched its scale and where the House of Lords debate took place. The discussion about the FDF also centers on the UK food industry. However, the broader debate about UPFs and the desire for clear guidance are relevant to consumers globally.
Age: Not explicitly defined, but the interest in healthy eating and understanding food risks likely spans various adult age groups.
Gender: Not specifically defined, but likely relevant to all genders who are concerned about their diet.
Income: Not explicitly detailed, but access to health apps like Zoe might suggest a focus on consumers with some level of disposable income and interest in health technology.
Lifestyle: Likely includes individuals who are trying to make healthier food choices, those who are confused by current dietary advice on processed foods, and those who are actively seeking tools to navigate the food landscape.
Conclusions:
Zoe's launch of its UPF risk scale highlights the ongoing efforts to refine how processed foods are categorized and how consumers are guided on their consumption. The controversy surrounding this new system reflects the complexities of the issue and the differing perspectives of health advocates and the food industry. Ultimately, the goal is to provide consumers with clear and scientifically sound information to support healthier dietary choices.
Implications for Brands:
Increased Scrutiny of Ingredients and Processing: Food manufacturers will likely face increasing pressure from health organizations and consumers regarding the ingredients and processing methods used in their products.
Potential Need for Reformulation: Depending on how consumers adopt new scales like Zoe's, food companies might need to consider reformulating products to fall into lower-risk categories.
Transparency and Communication Will Be Key: Food brands will need to be transparent about their ingredients and processing and effectively communicate their position in the ongoing UPF debate.
Implication for Society:
Potential Shift in Dietary Guidelines: If scales like Zoe's gain traction, they could influence future dietary recommendations from public health organizations.
Increased Consumer Awareness: The ongoing debate and the introduction of new tools will likely raise consumer awareness about processed foods.
Implications for Consumers:
Potentially More Nuanced Understanding of UPFs: New scales could help consumers move beyond a simple "good" or "bad" view of processed foods.
Empowerment Through Information: Tools like Zoe's scale aim to empower consumers to make more informed choices about their diet.
Potential for Confusion: Conflicting information and different classification systems could also lead to consumer confusion.
Implication for Future:
The future of food guidance will likely involve a more nuanced understanding of ultra-processed foods, with a move towards systems that can differentiate risks within this broad category. Technology will likely play an increasing role in delivering personalized and accessible dietary information to consumers.
Consumer Trend:
Seeking Nuanced Guidance on Processed Food Consumption
Description of the Trend (Seeking Nuanced Guidance on Processed Food Consumption):
Consumers are moving beyond simplistic "avoid processed foods" advice and are looking for more specific and nuanced guidance on which types of processed foods might pose higher or lower health risks. They desire tools and information that allow them to make informed choices rather than feeling overwhelmed by broad categorizations.
Consumer Sub Trend:
Leveraging Technology for Dietary Insights
Description of the Trend (Leveraging Technology for Dietary Insights):
Consumers are increasingly using health apps and digital tools to gain a better understanding of their diet and make healthier food choices. They are receptive to technology that can provide quick and personalized feedback on the nutritional value and potential risks of different foods.
Big Social Trend:
The Democratization of Health Information
Description of the Trend (The Democratization of Health Information):
Health information is increasingly accessible to the public through various sources beyond traditional medical authorities. This empowers consumers but also creates challenges in ensuring the accuracy and reliability of information. Zoe's initiative reflects this trend.
Worldwide Social Trend:
Global Focus on Diet and Non-Communicable Diseases
Description of the Trend (Global Focus on Diet and Non-Communicable Diseases):
There is a worldwide effort to address the rising rates of non-communicable diseases, with diet being recognized as a major contributing factor. This global focus drives research and the development of dietary guidelines, including those related to processed foods.
Social Drive:
Desire for Empowerment and Control Over Health
Description of the Trend (Desire for Empowerment and Control Over Health):
Consumers are increasingly proactive in taking control of their health and well-being. This includes seeking out information and tools that empower them to make healthier lifestyle choices, including their dietary habits.
Learnings for Brands to Use in 2025:
Understand Evolving Consumer Understanding of UPFs: Brands should monitor how consumers are interpreting new classification systems and their attitudes towards different types of processing.
Transparency Can Build Trust: Being open about ingredients and processing methods can help brands build trust with consumers who are increasingly scrutinizing food labels.
Focus on Less Processed Options Where Possible: Brands might benefit from highlighting or reformulating products to be less processed and align with consumer preferences for cleaner eating.
Strategy Recommendations for Brands to Follow in 2025:
Review Product Portfolios Based on Emerging UPF Scales: Assess how their products might be categorized under new systems like Zoe's and identify potential areas for improvement.
Communicate Ingredient Stories Clearly: Provide consumers with clear and accessible information about the ingredients in their products and their sourcing.
Invest in Research on Healthier Processing Methods: Explore innovative ways to process foods that minimize potential negative health impacts.
Final Sentence (key concept) describing main trend from article:
Zoe's launch of its UPF 'risk scale' reflects a broader movement towards providing consumers with more nuanced and technologically accessible guidance on navigating the complex landscape of processed foods, amidst ongoing debate and industry pushback.
What brands & companies should do in 2025 to benefit from trend and how to do it:
In 2025, food brands and companies should proactively engage with the evolving conversation around ultra-processed foods and the emergence of new classification systems. This includes understanding how their products might be perceived under these new scales, prioritizing transparency in their ingredient sourcing and processing methods, and potentially investing in research and development to offer less processed alternatives. By demonstrating a commitment to providing consumers with healthier options and clear information, brands can build trust and cater to the growing demand for nuanced guidance in this complex area of nutrition.
Final Note:
Core Trend:
Name: Refining UPF Classification for Informed Consumer Choices
Detailed Description: A shift towards developing more nuanced systems for classifying ultra-processed foods to provide consumers with better guidance on their potential health risks.
Core Strategy:
Name: Embrace Transparency and Monitor Evolving Classifications
Detailed Description: Food brands should prioritize transparency regarding ingredients and processing and stay informed about new UPF classification systems to adapt their products and communication strategies.
Core Industry Trend:
Name: Increasing Consumer Scrutiny of Food Processing
Detailed Description: Consumers are increasingly paying attention to how their food is processed and are seeking out more natural and minimally processed options.
Core Consumer Motivation:
Name: Seeking Clarity and Empowerment in Dietary Choices
Detailed Description: Consumers want clear, reliable information and tools that empower them to make healthier and more informed decisions about the processed foods they consume.
Core Trend Detailed:
The Shifting Landscape of Ultra-Processed Food Categorization and Consumer Guidance: This core trend underscores the growing dissatisfaction with the current broad categorization of ultra-processed foods and the increasing need for more granular and helpful guidance for consumers. The introduction of Zoe's Food Risk Scale is a prime example of this shift, attempting to differentiate between types of UPFs based on their potential health risks, acknowledging that not all processed foods are created equal. This move is driven by a combination of factors, including growing scientific understanding of the varying health impacts of different processing methods and ingredients, consumer demand for clearer and less alarmist information, and the limitations of existing classification systems like NOVA which can be perceived as overly simplistic. The food industry's strong reaction highlights the potential disruption these new systems could cause, as they may lead to increased scrutiny of certain product categories and manufacturing processes. Ultimately, this trend points towards a future where consumers are equipped with more sophisticated tools and information to navigate the complex world of processed foods, enabling them to make more informed choices that align with their health goals and preferences.
*Zoe app is currently available in the USA, UK, and Sweden.
Comments